Skip to main content

Fuji X-Pro1 first impressions


We've had a Fuji X-Pro1 in for review for a few days now, in preparation for a review, and thought we would share some initial impressions. Fuji has supplied the camera with all three lenses, the 18mm f/2, 35mm f/1.4 and 60mm f/2.4 (each lens comes supplied with a hood, the 18 and 35mm come with squared hoods and caps, while the 60mm has huge (deep) circular vented affair - which I don't like but is likely very effective). Don't expect the build quality of the camera or lenses to match what the company is doing for Hasselblad right now. Fuji manufacture the lenses and viewfinder optics for the Hasselblad H4-D models, but the X-Pro1 is in a different league, in terms of build.

The body is made from magnesium alloy, but it doesn't feel particularly durable in part because it feels so light. Each of the lenses are light in weight as well; there are no weighty brass helicoids, and the lens mounts are made from aluminum further adding to the impression of fragility. However, the camera's ergonomics are good for the best part, although there's no in-built diopter adjustment, meaning you'll have to source diopter correction lenses (I've asked Fuji if they intend to offer them, and I'm awaiting a reply).

UPDATE: I've since heard back that they aren't going to offer this as an option, saying third-party options exist. I don't know of any, though it should be easy to do, after all it was common practice with film cameras. I've suggested Fuji should seriously reconsider - this will be a showstopper for middle aged users and easy enough for Fuji to rectify.

UPDATE: A spokesperson for Fuji told me the Voigtlander range of diopter adjustment lenses with 19mm thread (for the R2a, R2m, R3a, R3m, R4a, R4m and Bessa III) can be used instead, please see here (in the UK) for further details. The price each is just £15 plus VAT (£18) each. Please check with the retailer first, as we can not be held responsible (UPDATE: I've heard back from the retailer, Robert White, and the diopter lenses fit perfectly).

The sensor appears to be excellent though the outright resolution doesn't appear to be a match for 21/22MP sensors with a AA filter - though more work needs to be done on testing before I can say with complete authority (it's unlikely the lenses can't resolve more so any limit on resolution will be down to the sensor). If you have any questions please ask below, and I'll try answer them, time permitting.



Fuji X-Pro1, 18mm f/2.0 (28mm equivalent) at f/4, ISO400; in-camera JPEG with some colour adjustment in Lightroom 4 (please view in a colour-aware browser, such as Apple's Safari).

Search Links

If you found this information helpful and intend to remunerate us for this expensive and time-consuming work, please clear your browser's cache of cookies if visiting from a referring photo-site before clicking on our links, as we're unlikely to receive the commission from the retailer. Thank you for buying through this site's links.

Search links for Amazon, Adorama.

Search links (UK), Jessops, WEX.

Related Posts


  1. The comparison with NEX-7 is of high interest to me. Looking for better tonal range and exposure accuracy than current m43 16 mpix has. The X-pro1 and the NEX-7 are the natural contenders. My thought is if I go for the Sony, I have to rely on the 24mm Zeiss and on 3rd party manual lenses for IQ. Fuji has lenses that seems very good to excellent + they have a sensible lens roadmap. The Sony lens road map is not encouraging at all....

  2. The NEX-7 is a strong contender in every area, and not just stills but video too where the E-mount is flexible enough to be used with various mounts including PL. But you are right concerning lenses for stills. The issue I see though with the X-Pro1 is that AF is slow and noisy - there is no internal focusing (IF) in the current three lenses. Though optically they appear to be very good (only an impression at this stage - I've not fully tested them). For£3,600 (inc VAT) you can have a very nice system from Fuji that fits in a Domke F6 with room to spare.

  3. You have a 23mm f/2?

  4. Nice catch - I've amended that. Thanks.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hasselblad H4D-60 review

UPDATE 18 May, 2012: Hasseblad is set to reduce the price on the H4D cameras by as much as $11,000 / 6,200 Euros on the H4D-60, bringing the price to 23,900 euros ($30,995 / £21,995). Please see here for more details.

The last couple of decades have been turbulent for medium format camera manufacturers, but now after several well-known names have withdrawn, the market looks healthy. Two new unexpected entrants, Leica and Pentax have added to the dynamic at opposing ends of the pricing scale, forcing the two established system players to compete fiercely in their traditional rarefied role as well as the entry-level.

Partnering with both Leaf and Mamiya, Phase One has developed a trio of entry-level Mamiya DM models starting at under $14k/ £9k while continuing to offer a wide range of Phase One and Leaf backs, up to 80-megapixels. Through various offers and incentives these backs, are most likely to be partnered with the 645DF body but they are in fact compatible with a wide range of …

Fujifilm IS Pro UV-IR DSLR review

Fuji’s IS Pro is the up-date to maker’s earlier S3 UV-IR camera, and like that particular camera, the IS Pro adopts a modified image sensor that’s not shielded from UV or IR light. Consequently, with various filtration methods, the IS Pro is designed for Ultraviolet (UVA), visible and near Infrared photography.

Although there is a healthy demand for DSLRs with IR capability especially, and there are number of independent vendors (mainly in the US, but the UK also) that offer IR dedicated and full-spectrum conversion of current Nikon and Canon bodies, it’s anticipated the IS Pro will appeal largely to the scientific and forensic communities. With the departure of the S3 UV-IR, Fuji’s IS Pro continues to be the only dedicated full-spectrum interchangeable lens based DSLR that has professional-level support from a camera maker. As well as official product support and 12-month warranty, for government agencies and the like, the OEM status of the IS Pro will be particularly reassuring an…

Mitsubishi CP-D70DW dye-sublimation printer review

Roll-fed dye-sublimation transfer printers are often used in photo-kiosks but with their fast operation and touch dry photos, they’re also the printer of choice for event photographers.

Mitsubishi Electric CP-D70DW


£1214 (£999 ex VAT) $1,399.95
Mitsubishi Electric;
Mac OS X 10.5 or Windows XP later
Print quality, job times, low media costs, durability, build, noise levels
Noise levels, paper handling niggles, colour profile on request

Buy at Adorama Camera (US) at $1,279.95, plus mail-in rebate available. Buy at Amazon US (sold by Adorama).

Buy the Dual deck CP-D70DW at Adorama now at $1,939.95, plus mail-in rebate (was $2,950).


Unlike the process of dithering liquid ink in an inkjet, dye-sublimation printers produce authentic continuous tone images with an analogous look like that of a conventional lab-produced print. They achieve this using thin c…